Showing posts with label Channing Tatum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Channing Tatum. Show all posts

Monday, March 10, 2014

A Year in Advance Oscar Predictions 2014: Best Supporting Actor

I'll be the first to admit that, historically, this is my worst category at predicting so far in advance. It's always hard to know exactly which roles will land, how parts will be campaigned, and, most importantly, if there's enough there to warrant a nomination. The 5 men I've decided on consist of 3 previous winners in this category, a veteran character actor that seems to have a buzz-worthy role in a hit from Sundance, and a relatively new movie star trying to prove his worth as an actor by scoring his first Oscar nomination.

Best Supporting Actor
Benicio Del Toro Inherent Vice
J.K. Simmons Whiplash
Channing Tatum Foxcatcher
Christopher Walken Jersey Boys
Christoph Waltz Big Eyes

* * *

Benicio Del Toro Inherent Vice

The Role: Del Torro teams up with Joaquin Phoenix in Paul Thomas Anderson's adaptation of the Thomas Pynchon novel. He plays a character named Sauncho Smilax, the attorney to main character Doc (Phoenix), who is called upon time and time again to get his friend and client out of scraps.   
Why He'll Be Nominated: Del Toro is just one of those actors that I tend to always choose for nominations. He's so talented that I feel anytime he's involved with something, it's worth taking notice. Nominated twice before (and a winner for Traffic), it seems the Academy likes him as well (although, he hasn't been nominated in over 10 years). I haven't read the novel yet, but hear the part he plays is relatively small–with the potential to steal scenes. Anderson has apparently said the film feels like a Cheech and Chong movie. If anyone could make the Academy take notice of a stoner flick, it's him. Hopefully, Del Toro's turn in the film will be just the sort of tasty treat the Academy will crave.

J.K. Simmons Whiplash


The Role: Reprising his role from the award-winng short on which the film is based, Simmons plays a hard-ass, profanity spewing...jazz instructor that challenges Miles Teller to be the best damn jazz drummer he can be.
Why He'll Be Nominated: Whiplash, which was already a hit at Sundance last year when it won the Jury prize for best short film, was a big winner at the festival again this year when it took home the top Audience and Grand Jury prize for dramatic film. Almost all of the reviews have singled out Simmons for his performance in the film as a definite standout. The actor, who has been working steadily for years in television and commercials and been giving solid supporting turns in Oscar nominated films like Juno and Up in the Air seems to have finally found a role that allows him to shine. If the film's Sundance success translates to wider audiences, it seems that Simmons could be looking at his first Oscar nomination. 


Channing Tatum Foxcatcher


The Role: Taking on the real-life role of Olympic gold medal-winning wrestler Mark Schultz, Tatum plays the brother of fellow Olympian and murder victim Dave Schultz (Mark Ruffalo). Dave was shot by millionaire John du Pont (Steve Carrell) on his estate where the brothers trained. The film is based on the autobiography that Mark wrote about the event.
Why He'll Be Nominated: Already named the Sexiest Man Alive by People magazine, it seems that being just a pretty face (and abs and ass and...) just isn't enough for Channing Tatum. Although he's shown himself to be a talented actor in both comedy and drama (he's especially good in his Indie Spirit nominated role in A Guide to Recognizing Your Saints), it seems that tackling this part could bring him the kind of respect afforded other handsome male stars, like Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise before him, that had to prove their worth with the Academy. 21 Jump Street co-star Jonah Hill scored his first Oscar nomination working with director Bennett Miller. Perhaps the director will be the key to scoring Tatum's first nomination as well. Just imagine the ads if the two make a third Jump Street film...  

Christopher Walken Jersey Boys

The Role: The Oscar winner plays Gyp DeCarlo, the New Jersey crime boss that had ties to The Four Seasons (the real DeCarlo was also involved with Frank Sinatra). This is the film version of the Tony award-winning musical based on the lives of the popular singing group.
Why He'll Be Nominated: Although this particular role was not an awards magnet when the show was on stage, the reason I think Walken could score here is for the simple fact that he's Christopher Walken. This category tends to go for performances from seasoned actors and Walken, being directed by Clint Eastwood, and the only known "name" in the film could be the kind of performance that the Academy goes for. I'm just hoping that this performance is as good as his charmingly sinister role as the tap-dancing pimp in Pennies From Heaven, which should have brought a nomination in this category years ago...

Christoph Waltz Big Eyes


The Role: Playing opposite Oscar hopeful Amy Adams in this Tim Burton film, Waltz plays "artist" Walter Keane. Keane became a celebrity in the 60s due to the popular paintings he claimed ownership for that were, in fact, created by his wife.
Why He'll Be Nominated: After winning a pair of Oscars in this category for roles that were arguably leads, it seems that Waltz may find himself with a third nomination (it would be his first for a non-Tarantino film) for a another role that could potentially be a lead as well. We'll have to wait to see whom exactly the focus of the film is on. It sounds like more of Margaret Keane's story to me. And if Harvey Weinstein wants to make the campaign all about getting Amy a win, it seems logical that putting Waltz in supporting would put the focus more on her. Waltz who seems to take delight in playing villainous roles, could find himself rewarded once again for taking on this unlikable figure. 

Other Possibilities: Josh Brolin Inherent Vice, Johnny Depp Into the Woods, Robert Duvall The Judge, Garrett Hedlund Unbroken, Mark Ruffalo Foxcatcher

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Yeah, But Their Costumes Come Off...

Summer isn't even here yet and I'm kinda over all the blockbusters vying for our attention. And try as I might, I just can't muster up any excitement for two of the biggest ones, The Avengers or Prometheus. Every day seems to bring a new clip from the films or a new screen grab from the teaser trailer, leading up to the actual trailer, and I don't even think about clicking on it. And the thing is, I've seen all the Marvel superhero movies (Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Iron Man 2: The Curse of ScarJo) that make up said Avengers. I enjoyed them all, more or less (Are we including the two Hulk movies or are we supposed to pretend they didn't happen? Which, I mean, I'm fine with...). But, something about them all together (now with Oscar nominees Mark Ruffalo and Jeremy Renner!) makes me less than thrilled. How are they gonna cram all of them in and have a story that make senses? And more importantly, where are Gwyneth and Natalie? I need at least one Oscar winning actress in my superhero movies (Dark Knight Rises, you are so lucky you have Marion).

And my disinterest in Prometheus isn't necessarily the movies fault. I haven't even watched anything to be turned-off by it. But, the thing is...here goes...I've never seen any of the films in the Aliens franchise. Are you happy now? I said it. So it's hard for me to get excited about something that I know nothing about nor have any special affinity for. And Prometheus even stars two actors that I really like. Charlize, Fassy, help me out here! Should I feel bad about not wanting to see it? It's not even like a real mindless blockbuster either. Serious film lover's seem genuinely interested in it. But, sci-fi is my least favorite genre. Kinda like Japanese is my least favorite type of food. Sci-fi is the sushi of cinema for me. And I know lots of people love sushi, but it's just not my thing.

What is my thing, however, is Channing Tatum's...thing. And we can finally feast our eyes on the newly minted A-lister's ass-ets (I'm Carrie Bradshaw all of a sudden with the sexual puns) in the trailer that was just released of his summer movie, Magic Mike.


Now this looks like the perfect summer movie. A charismatic Channing doing all his moves from Step Up in half the amount of clothes. Matthew McConaughey in a performance that looks bat-shit crazy/awesome (there's Oscar talk for a Supporting Actor Nom? Yeah, I'm game). It seems like just the right amount of escapism and intelligence (quiet, you) to make up for all the load explosions and aliens invading the movie theaters in the next couple of months.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

March Is the New Summer

I feel like it all began with the unexpected success of 300 back in March of 2007. Up until then, everyone knew that if you had a potential blockbuster on your hands you released it in the summer. Big-budget, popcorn films and summers off just go hand in hand. Something about not being in school and the heat just make you wanna go to an air-conditioned theatre for a couple hours and turn your brain off. But, all that changed with the $70.89 million opening weekend of 300. Suddenly, studios realized that summer movies didn't have to be released in summer. (I wonder if they'll ever realize that Oscar movies don't always have to be released in the final weeks of December? It gets so hard trying to see everything at awards time when they're all released at the same time. They're probably afraid that if people actually had time to think about a film, they'd realize that it's not as good as they initially thought.)

With the success of 300, each year since has had a major March release. Tim Burton's (horrible) take on Alice in Wonderland in 2010 is still the biggest success of any film released in March. Its opening weekend was $116.1 million and its final US gross was $334.19 million. With the better-than-expected $70.2 million opening of Dr. Seuss' The Lorax this past weekend and a couple more high-profile, blockbuster films coming out this month, I think it's safe to say that March is no longer in the forgettable, barren wasteland stretch between awards bait and summer fare, but has established itself as the beginning of the Summer Blockbuster Season (if only the March weather would realize that)...

'I have a feeling we're going sink faster than the Titanic. The ship not the movie. Is there still a chance to join the cast of The Hunger Games?'
March 9: John Carter of Mars
This Friday brings the release of Pixar director, Andrew Stanton's first venture into live-action with the reported $250 million budgeted, John Carter. There has been a lot of press about this film lately– all bout how the over-budget film is looking to be one of the biggest flops in history. Last year, they decided to change the title of the film (based on a series of books from the early 1900's by Edgar Rice Burroughs) from John Carter of Mars to the very generic sounding, John Carter (that's also the name of Noah Wiley's character from 'ER' which would be a different movie altogether). Apparently, they were afraid that the sci-fi aspect of the film would alienate (pun intended) a potential audience. But, I mean, the film is set on Mars. You can only fool people so much. They're gonna realize once (and if) they actually see the movie. Because they haven't embraced what the film actually is, the average movie goer has no idea what the film is about now. It really hasn't been marketed well and I read some reviews today that weren't too glowing. Entertainment Weekly gave it a D, y'all. Things aren't looking good for its success or the intended trilogy it was supposed to start. But, every interview I've been reading with director Andrew Stanton has been really interesting and he's wanted to make this movie since he read the books as a kid. It makes me really want it to succeed. People were predicting a huge flop with Avatar as well and that turned out for the best (Oscar noms and blockbuster status ain't too bad). We'll find out on Monday how it all goes down.

March 16: 21 Jump Street
Academy Award nominee (it's still strange to write that before his name) Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum team up on this buddy comedy based on the Fox TV series from the late 80's/early 90's that started Johnny Depp's career. Chan is already starting 2012 off well as his rom-tragedy with Rachel McAdams, The Vow, is one of two films that have already grossed over $100 million in the US. The other being Safe House. (Two very different movies. Good job on keeping Hollywood guessing what makes a hit, America.) I really don't see this as being a huge blockbuster, but it should be a reasonable hit that should make some money. That is until the following weekend when a certain movie gets released...

"Hey, this guy from ER wants to join our movie."
March 23: The Hunger Games
Get ready because this is gonna be huge. Tickets already went on sale last month and are tracking at Twilight levels of success. But, this film really has the potential to be even bigger than those films. People keep comparing them because they're both based on a hugely successful YA trilogy of novels, but the appeal of Hunger Games is more vast. Everyone is reading them–not just females. This movie is so big that no other films are being released that weekend. I'm really looking forward to it. But, I wish the damn thing would open already as everyday brings the release of some new trailer or clip or new 100 stills from the film. I would share them, but do we really need to see and know everything about it before it's released? Until then, we can always satiate our appetite for the film (and actual hunger) with these cookies from Eleni's bakery. Nothing celebrates children fighting each other to the death quite like a sugar cookie with Jennifer Lawrence's face.

March 30: Mirror Mirror and Wrath of the Titans 
Oh, boy. I don't really see either of these films (Mirror Mirror is the first of two Snow White based films released this year and Wrath is the sequel to 2010's Clash of the Titans) doing that great. (Have you seen the trailer for Mirror Mirror? It looks so bad. Julia is really straining herself with the comedy and everything looks so unintentionally hilarious. And the poster everywhere here in NY looks like it's for an ABC Family TV movie. Her evil queen is no Charlize or even Sigourney Weaver, for that matter.) But, the studios must think they have a place in this suddenly crowded, potential Blockbuster month. It's nice to have options if you don't feel like seeing Hunger Games a third or fourth time...